No country for old men who just want a few pints-s

cheapbag214s

No country for old men that just want a few pints
It seems that TD Christy O'Sullivan's real crime last week was not to become arrested on suspicion to be over the drink-driving limit. Christy's real crime was thoughtcrime,[url=http://duveticaitaliaoutlet.webmium.com/][b]duvetica jackets[/b][/url].
This is perhaps no surprise given that we reside in a madly politically correct society along with a society that has a drunk's ambivalent attitude to drink -- that it is the reason for and also the solution to all of our problems. As a society we're enthusiastic about drink in the way a dry drunk is, or the way in which an anorexic or perhaps a dieter is obsessed by food. It's an unhealthy 'all or nothing' approach. And anyone who suggests a middle ground is shouted down by the mob.
So Christy O'Sullivan's real crime last week was he questioned our rigid thinking about drink: "I feel sorry for individuals in rural Ireland now who cannot take a drink," he explained as a direct consequence of allegedly failing a breath test,[url=http://rogervivieronlinesale.olimx.com/][b]http://rogervivieronlinesale.olimx.com/[/b][/url], "And that's where I had been, in the heart of rural Ireland." This could have seemed a reasonably innocuous comment to make inside a society that has essentially floated on the sea of booze for generations now. But Deputy O'Sullivan was instructed to 'rethink' his comments almost immediately.
A man who had not yet been actually charged with anything was forced to apologise not just to be breathalysed whatsoever to begin with but additionally, "lest [his] comments on drink-driving laws in rural Ireland be misinterpreted",[url=http://monclerjackenonlinech.albirank.net/][b]Moncler Weste Billig[/b][/url], he wished to state he "fully accepted what the law states as it applies to everyone". So hysterical did it all have that there have been calls for Batt O'Keeffe to resign for merely pointing out that Christy O'Sullivan knew what he did was wrong and had apologised but that people counseled me only human.
Even through the lofty standards from the Mahon era, this can be a new level of madness. Apparently we have now expect our public representatives not to be human and anyone who suggests they might be merely human should resign in disgrace. You've got to think we're setting ourselves up for disappointment there. Because we are all only human, even, perhaps especially,[url=http://parajumperssalenorge.albirank.net/][b]Parajumpers Long Bear Online[/b][/url], the brand new puritans of the media.
It would be a pity if Christy O'Sullivan's initial comments, when he said what he really thought, got lost within the indignation over his possible drink driving. In the risk of being branded a reckless alcoholic, I have to admit which i agreed with him the first time,[url=http://giuseppezanottisneakerssale.olimx.com/][b]giuseppe zanotti sneakers with[/b][/url], and that i didn't accept his subsequent "clarification". Actually, what the law states shouldn't apply equally to everybody in the case of drink-driving limits.
I ought to say at this point that towards the better of my knowledge and recollection, I have not got behind the wheel of a car with drink on me. I'm not saying it'll never happen but it is unlikely. Driving is generally the very last thing on my small mind when I've had a few drinks. I reckon you're either drinking or else you're doing other stuff, like driving. And when I'm having a few pints, I've no great urge to do other things,[url=http://monclerjackenonlinech.albirank.net/][b]Moncler Günstig[/b][/url], never mind driving. It would be easy for me then to decide that nobody should enter an automobile having a drop of drink in it. It can't affect me whatsoever.
And that's perhaps precisely why young men in cities shouldn't make rigid laws for old men in the united states. My dating life, or indeed my entire life, wouldn't be devastated by zero tolerance on drink driving. However, many people in rural Ireland have intolerable loneliness and isolation because of draconian drink-driving laws -- laws of which they aren't the target.
And it's nothing as trivial as that they can't go for a pint. What it really means in reality is that mostly of the occasions within the week once they might actually speak with other people has been obtained from them, obtained from them due to a law that was made to tackle another problem entirely.
In fact, worse again, many rural individuals are having their lives ruined by a law that probably doesn't even solve the issue it's supposed to solve. If that's not bad law, I'm not sure what is.
And let me know, maybe you have been lonely? Maybe you have been completely isolated? For those who have, you know that loneliness and isolation are not just trivial, acceptable collateral damage for any greater good. They're devastating to people.
This is a very emotive area why don't we just look briefly at some facts: Speed is the greatest killer on the highway -- everybody and every quango agrees on this. Yet there isn't any serious discussion about reducing speed limits within this country. It certainly doesn't seem to be about the agenda for that new road safety legislation. Actually, whenever we changed to kilometres recently, a minimum of some speed limits went up slightly.
Seatbelts really are a huge factor in road deaths,[url=http://duveticaukoutlet.halod.com/][b]http://duveticaukoutlet.halod.com/[/b][/url], too. Yet the penalty because of not wearing a seatbelt is a mere two penalty points. Many pedestrians are killed in darkness yet there isn't any messianic zeal about forcing pedestrians or even cyclists who're on the highway at night to light themselves up like Christmas trees. This really is all because we are, like a society, fixated on drink, and fixated about the idea of not drinking, or drinking less, as being the solution to everything.
Furthermore, we will not actually save many lives by reduction of blood alcohol limits from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg, which is the current proposal. We do not seem to have any statistics for how so many people are killed by drivers who've between 50 and 80mg of alcohol within their blood, which is the number of lives we'd presumably save by bringing down the amount from 80 to 50.
What we do know is the fact that most accidents where alcohol is a factor involve blood alcohol levels of 150mg to 300mg.
In other words, in most accidents where alcohol is a factor, the folks driving are 2 to 4 times the present limit anyway. So bringing it down further can make no difference. The other greater truth, that we all know anecdotally -- even if they are not keen to provide us hard figures to back it up -- is the fact that a farmer that has gone for a few pints isn't likely to kill anyone driving home a back road in the pub at 20 miles per hour.
Everyone knows the reality. Accidents in rural areas overwhelmingly take place in the first hours of the morning in cars driven by younger people and they are largely driving fast and pissed from their minds and perhaps on drugs, too. It is also unlikely that they'll have been doing the majority of their drinking in pubs. The likelihood is that they'll have been drinking out of off licences. Because the Vintners Federation people prefer to say, in a pub they pour one pint at a time, observe how it goes down, and then they make a phone call on whether or not to serve another. They do not sell 24 pints together at cheap rates for drinking in a frenzied, fairly non-social environment.
So,[url=http://rogervivieronlinesale.olimx.com/][b]cheap 2013 roger vivier online sale[/b][/url], to get back to Christy O'Sullivan's point the law applies equally to everyone, I think everyone knows this makes no sense. Old men driving home slowly on back roads in the pub with two pints on them should not be subject to exactly the same restrictions as other people.
You may think this crazy or unworkable however this is the type of sensible solution we apply in other areas of road safety. For instance, we have different speed limits for various roads and everyone agrees it would be crackers to possess one posted speed limit everywhere.
In terms of drink driving, other countries like Germany have graduated systems whereby drivers under 21 have a zero alcohol limit which increases for seniors. It appears that the Germans convey more cop-on than we do about this. That is faintly embarrassing.
We badly need to inject a number of Christy O'Sullivan and Batt O'Keeffe's honesty, humanity,[url=http://duveticapiumini.olimx.com/][b]Duvetica italy[/b][/url], good sense and reality into our road safety policy. And that we need to understand that laws are only for trade-offs. If the cost of this obsessive campaign to continually lower drink-driving limits will get rid of rural life and lead people into further isolation and despair, without actually saving lives,[url=http://woolrichoutletde.albirank.net/][b]Woolrich Online Shop[/b][/url], as the real problems of actual drunk drivers speeding round the place continues, then the law is an ass.
I am not saying driving under the influence is a great thing. It is a terrible thing and that i don't condone it by any means. But making kneejerk, ideologically driven laws that do not actually focus on the real problem certainly isn't the response to it.
And becoming morally outraged about anybody who attempts to be truthful about it, simply because this country has issues around drink, won't serve us well either.
相关的主题文章：

[url=http://bbs.yuxue.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2187184]http://bbs.yuxue.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2187184[/url]

[url=http://www.experienceproject.com/]http://www.experienceproject.com/[/url]

[url=http://erezstrauss.com/node/3#comment-185810]http://erezstrauss.com/node/3#comment-185810[/url]

[url=http://222.186.59.108/thread-766517-1-1.html]http://222.186.59.108/thread-766517-1-1.html[/url]

[url=http://www.87years.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2691175&fromuid=20884]http://www.87years.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2691175&fromuid=20884[/url]

[url=http://www.miralaxhffwz.fora.pl/raina-propped-why-lsd-stays-in-the-body-cradled-the-hey-mean-addiction-recovery-forum-adderall-addiction-wisdom,1/skechers-men-shape,29250.html#29298]http://www.miralaxhffwz.fora.pl/raina-propped-why-lsd-stays-in-the-body-cradled-the-hey-mean-addiction-recovery-forum-adderall-addiction-wisdom,1/skechers-men-shape,29250.html#29298[/url]

[url=http://www.2.wm520u.com/viewthread.php?tid=1714978&extra=]http://www.2.wm520u.com/viewthread.php?tid=1714978&extra=[/url]

[url=http://vert.dk/how-much-is-too-much-for-kids-clothesspun4.html]http://vert.dk/how-much-is-too-much-for-kids-clothesspun4.html[/url]

[url=http://www.ytgay.com/read.php?tid-1905.html.html]http://www.ytgay.com/read.php?tid-1905.html.html[/url]

[url=http://www.0436xsw.com/thread-7678-1-1.html]http://www.0436xsw.com/thread-7678-1-1.html[/url]

[url=http://www.yaoshi77.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=308358]http://www.yaoshi77.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=308358[/url]

[url=http://www.life3721.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=208632]http://www.life3721.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=208632[/url]

[url=http://hacklab.cereza.org.mx/wp/kool-aid-sneakers-kool-aid-sneakers]http://hacklab.cereza.org.mx/wp/kool-aid-sneakers-kool-aid-sneakers[/url]

[url=http://www.antabusemrlnh.fora.pl/asher-slipped-werewolf-but-some-sound-pure-human-fooled,1/rotunde-er-246-ffnet-am-mittwoch-23022010,12383.html#12407]http://www.antabusemrlnh.fora.pl/asher-slipped-werewolf-but-some-sound-pure-human-fooled,1/rotunde-er-246-ffnet-am-mittwoch-23022010,12383.html#12407[/url]

[url=http://www.whiteagle.net/sp/support-training-espa%C3%B1a-centro-de-pruebas-de-ingl%C3%A9s#comment-296094]http://www.whiteagle.net/sp/support-training-espa%C3%B1a-centro-de-pruebas-de-ingl%C3%A9s#comment-296094[/url]