neutral&quot

cheapbag214s

administrators. Barring a major change in the Court's personnel for Fisher v. University of Texas, Part Deux, it is only a matter of time before the Texas policy, and all such admissions policies, are deemed to be too infected by race to survive alongside those lofty "neutral" principles this Court believes should suffice.My Atlantic colleague, Garrett Epps, has much more today on Fisher, so I would like to focus here instead upon three thematic rulings today that will be otherwise under-reported. In each case, the Court's five-member conservative caucus, already arguably the most pro-business in 75 years, voted in favor of corporate interests and employers over the interests of consumers and employees. In each case, the Court's four liberal members dissented. Vance v. Ball State UniversityFirst there was Vance,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], a workplace case about a black woman complaining about the actions of a white woman. The plaintiff, Maette Vance, sued under Title VII, the federal law, alleging that she had been subjected